CRAFTing 2010
It was also a remarkable year for our new firm, CRAFT | Media / Digital.
After our January launch, we quickly got to work delivering high quality communications consulting and services in the media, digital and print channels.
Our clients faced unique challenges, and we set our sights high. Whether it was working for candidates for Governor, U.S. Senate, Congress and State Legislature, or gaining support for a key issue, we executed communications efforts to achieve victory.
Here is a glimpse at what those victories looked like for CRAFT and our clients:
- CRAFT produced work directly on behalf of our clients or on behalf of issue advocacy clients in the following federal races where Republicans won:
Rep. Joe Wilson (SC-02), Kevin Yoder (KS-03), Dan Benishek (MI-01), Kelly Ayotte (NH-SEN), Roy Blunt (MO-SEN), Ron Johnson (WI-SEN), Pat Toomey (PA-SEN), Sen. John McCain (AZ-SEN), Frank Guinta (NH-01), Charlie Bass (NH-02), Mike Kelly (PA-03), Pat Meehan (PA-07), Tom Marino (PA-10), Jaime Herrera (WA-03), Paul Gosar (AZ-01), Bobby Schilling (IL-17), Mike Fitzpatrick (PA-08), Steve Stivers (OH-15), Scott Rigell (VA-02), Martha Roby (AL-02), Raul Labrador (ID-01), Alan Nunnalee (MS-01), Andy Harris (MD-01), Vicky Hartzler (MO-04), Nan Hayworth (NY-19) and Richard Hanna (NY-24).
- CRAFT produced work for the three major party committees, including:
The Republican National Committee (RNC), The National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) and The National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC). - CRAFT produced work for leading national PACs, issue organizations and trade associations including:
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Heritage Action for America, American Solutions, Keep America Safe, Keep Israel Safe, American Crossroads, American Action Network, the College Republican National Committee, The Manhattan Institute, Emergency Committee for Israel, Kevin McCarthy’s McPAC, Aaron Schock’s Generation Y-PAC and Tim Pawlenty’s FreedomFirst PAC.
Below is a snapshot of the work CRAFT produced on behalf of our clients:
- CRAFT produced over 200 broadcast TV, radio ads and web videos, with television ads airing in over 50 broadcast markets in 22 states.
- CRAFT produced close to 2 million pieces of direct mail in over 17 states.
- CRAFT designed, built, and deployed over 20 websites and placed over $1 million in online advertising. CRAFT also launched a premiere online activist platform for a national issue organization, that yielded over 50,000 contacts and netted over a half million dollars in contributions, in just under four months.
- CRAFT’s television or web media have been featured on major news networks includingFOX News Channel, CNN and MSNBC and on national programs including Face the Nation, This Week With George Stephanopoulos, Morning Joe, Rush Limbaugh,Glenn Beck and Hugh Hewitt.
- CRAFT’s online intelligence team placed stories for our clients on top political blogs and online news sites including: Hot Air, Michelle Malkin, RedState, Hugh Hewitt, Instapundit, Townhall, National Journal’s Hotline On Call, The Daily Caller, Huffington Post, Gateway Pundit, American Spectator’s blog, National Review Online, The Weekly Standard, Talking Points Memo and leading state-focused blogs across the country.
- CRAFT’s online intelligence team generated news for our clients in mainstream media outlets including: The New York Times, The Atlantic, Los Angeles Times, San Francisco Chronicle, Sacramento Bee, Orange County Register, POLITICO, The Hill, Real Clear Politics, CQ-Roll Call, Cook Political Report and Stuart Rothenberg Political Report.
Size Doesn’t Matter. It’s How You Use It.
Most people who run online campaigns are used to questions about list size. “How big is our list? How can we get more emails? How can we reach 100k, 200k, a million or more?” Rarely do the higher ups ask “How many of our people actually read our messages? How many actually took action on an ask?”
Size is often all that matters.
While most corporate marketing programs focus on the ROI of the list – specifically looking at cost of acquisition, open/response/conversion rates, and lifetime value of the contact – most political and advocacy organizations focus solely on how many names are in the database. It’s flawed thinking.
Here are a couple of ways to get more from your list without obsessively focusing on the number.
Voter Registration
One of the first questions political campaigns should ask is “How many of our email addresses are matched to a registered voter?” Campaigns may be surprised to learn that nearly half of their email supporters can’t actually vote because they are not registered.
List appends are typically reserved for adding marginal, opt-out addresses to your file. These addresses are often unresponsive and only serve to clutter your file. They end up being the Zombies that bring down a healthy list.
Campaigns should instead consider a physical address match to their file. Many vendors will take your email addresses and provide you with a matched name and physical address. You can then compare your email file to registration roles.
The benefits are clear. Identifying your unregistered voters allows you to get them registered. That’s obvious. What may be less obvious though is the value of that particular voter. They came to you. This isn’t a random grocery store/county fair acquired voter. These people are interested in your campaign, more likely to turn out if asked by you, and, most importantly, much easier to move to activist status with some work.
They should be guaranteed votes for your campaign – which most untargeted voter registration efforts can’t claim. More importantly, they can easily become your super-activists.
Make Your Emails Personal
Most campaigns think of email in two capacities – as a source of funds, or as recipients of information. Campaign emails either ask for money, or distribute press releases and random messages. Rarely do they put more thought into an ongoing relationship.
Think about the types of material the visitor is likely to receive – news or volunteer opportunities. Those are pretty much it. Yet many email programs don’t recognize even that basic distinction.
Many campaigns have a simple “Sign up for News” option on their page. They typically ask for minimal information like first name, email, and maybe a zip code.
The trouble with this approach is it acts as a bait and switch for your supporter. That person will likely get volunteer information, finance asks, and the news they actually asked for.
Instead, consider asking them to sign up, but include checkboxes for the type of material they want – news and volunteer activities.
News Subscribers
If they choose news, greet them with a message from the Communications Director specifically explaining the types of material they will receive. Make the subject clear so they know the message is in reply to their subscription.
If possible, you should also ask them to visit a page to manage their profile and choose specific news types – including press releases – they might like to receive.
When you send news, don’t just blast out the release. Make it a personal message from the Comms person with a short note that frames the release. Don’t assume they are constantly paying attention, and give them context, not just content.
Anyone who has affirmatively chosen not to get Volunteer requests, shouldn’t get any. They can, however, get finance asks. These are best done in concert with new ads that are announced, or specific products. The brief introduction should frame the ad, and suggest a donation to help keep the ad on the air.
Volunteers (and Donors)
If your subscriber chose to Volunteer, make the first message a personal greeting/introduction from the person who will manage your volunteer efforts. Clearly articulate the kinds of messages they will receive and the types of activities with which they can help
Your supporters will greatly appreciate the recognition of their value, and the personal nature of the message. They will likely even reply, so be sure someone can answer incoming messages. Don’t relegate these to an “info@” box. Theses are the people who will work to get you elected. Don’t take them for granted.
Every message should build on the relationship between your campaign and your supporter. That is true with volunteers more than anyone else. You should leave the supporter feeling involved, not lectured, or worse, ignored.
Each ask should be framed in the same way the news content is. Don’t consider a new ad rollout to just be news. Send a note to your volunteers sharing the ad (framing it, as above) and asking them to pass it around.
Volunteers should be asked for money, but not without context. We need your cash to beat our opposition isn’t as compelling as a specific, tangible result. This is why thermometer fundraising is so effective. Don’t just ask for money. These are volunteers, after all. Instead, give them a project or goal, and specific measurable ways to help.
The Facebook Effect
Many campaigns have applied the same “size matters” approach to Facebook, constantly pushing for more “Likes.” At the same time, most people recognize that while there may be limited correlation between Likes and election outcomes, there is most certainly no causation.
That is true of email to. I am aware of absolutely no study demonstrating causation (or even correlation) between list size and election results. It is simply too easy to append data or buy a list. If everyone on your list was dumped in without permission, and nobody reads your messages, the list is ineffective. Its impact on the election will be none.
It doesn’t have to be that way.
People who have effective Facebook campaigns invest time in growing and interacting with those supporters. The same can be true of email. Spending time to talk with your list (not at them), and developing that relationship into more than a one-way communication channel will yield greater results.
Keeping the email content relevant, making the messages personal, and creating a relationship with your readers doesn’t have to be a daunting task. It does, however, require more thought.
The upside, however, is the results should more than pay off with regard to supporter engagement, dollars raised, votes cast and their likelihood to carry your message.
Follow the GOP Freshmen Class
In January, CRAFT wrote about the nuts and bolts of Twitter. Now, we have compiled a Twitter list of the Republican Freshmen class. For those who use Twitter, this list can serve as a constant source of news and information from our nation’s newest Republican lawmakers.
Follow the Twitter list here: @CRAFTdc/follow-the-freshmen.
Senate
(Listed by state.)
- John Boozman (Arkansas) @JohnBoozman | @boozman4AR
- Marco Rubio (Florida) @SenRubioPress | @marcorubio
- Mark Kirk (Illinois) @SenatorKirk | @kirk4senate
- Dan Coats (Indiana) @SenDanCoats | @dancoats
- Jerry Moran (Kansas) @JerryMoran
- Rand Paul (Kentucky)@SenRandPaul | @RandPaulSenate
- Roy Blunt (Missouri) @RoyBlunt
- Kelly Ayotte (New Hampshire) @ayotte2010
- John Hoeven (North Dakota) @hoeven4senate
- Rob Portman (Ohio) @robportman | @Portman4Senate
- Pat Toomey (Pennsylvania) @SenToomey | @ToomeyForSenate
- Michael S. Lee (Utah) @SenMikeLee | @mikelee2010
- Ron Johnson (Wisconsin) @SenRonJohnson | @ron4senate
House
(Listed by state.)
- Martha Roby (Alabama 2) @RepMarthaRoby | @MarthaRoby
- Mo Brooks (Alabama 5) @RepMoBrooks | @MoInTheHouse
- Rick Crawford (Arkansas 1) @RepRickCrawford | @Crawford4Cong
- Tim Griffin (Arkansas 2) @RepTimGriffin | @griffincongress
- Steve Womack (Arkansas 3) @rep_stevewomack | @womack4congress
- Paul Gosar (Arizona 1) @RepGosar | @Gosar4Congress
- Ben Quayle (Arizona 3) @benquayle | @bquayle
- David Schweikert (Arizona 5) @RepDavid
- Jeff Denham (California 19) @JeffDenham
- Scott Tipton (Colorado 3) @RepTipton | @ScottRTipton
- Cory Gardner (Colorado 4) @RepCory
- Steve Southerland (Florida 2) @Rep_Southerland | @SoutherlandFL02
- Rich Nugent (Florida 5) @RepRichNugent | @sheriffnugent
- Daniel Webster (Florida 8 ) @WebsterCongress
- Dennis A. Ross (Florida 12) @RepDennisRoss
- Allen West (Florida 22) @AllenWestFL | @AllenWest2010
- Sandy Adams (Florida 24) @RepSandyAdams | @SandyAdams4FL24
- David Rivera (Florida 25) @RepRivera | @DavidRiveraFL
- Rob Woodall (Georgia 7) @votewoodall
- Austin Scott (Georgia 8 ) @AustinScottGA08 | @ScottForGA
- Raúl Labrador (Idaho 1) @Labrador4Idaho
- Joe Walsh (Illinois 8 ) @RepJoeWalsh | @JoeWalsh8th
- Robert Dold (Illinois 10) @ROBERTDOLD
- Adam Kizinger (Illinois 11) @RepKinzinger | @electadam
- Randy Hultgren (Illinois 14) @RandyHultgren
- Bobby Schiling (Illinois 17) @RepSchilling | @Bobby2010
- Todd Rokita (Indiana 4) @ToddRokita
- Larry Bucshon (Indiana 8 ) @RepLarryBucshon | @Larry_Bucshon
- Todd Young (Indiana 9) @RepToddYoung | @ty4c
- Tim Huelskamp (Kansas 1) @CongHuelskamp | @TimHuelskamp
- Kevin Yoder (Kansas 3) @KevinYoder
- Mike Pompeo (Kansas 4) @mikepompeo
- Jeff Landry (Louisiana 3) @repjefflandry | @LandryForLA
- Andy Harris (Maryland 1) @Harris4Congress
- Dan Benishek (Michigan 1) @DanoMI1 | @Benishek
- Bill Huizenga (Michigan 2) @RepHuizenga | @billhuizenga
- Justin Amash (Michigan 3) @repjustinamash
- Tim Walberg (Michigan 7) @RepWalberg | @Tim_Walberg
- Chip Cravaack (Minnesota 8 ) @RepChipCravaack | @ChipCravaack
- Alan Nunnelee (Mississippi 1) @RepAlanNunnelee | @Nunnelee2010
- Steven Palazzo (Mississippi 4) @StevenPalazzo
- Vicky Hartzler (Missouri 4) @RepHartzler | @VickyHartzler
- Billy Long (Missouri 7) @BillyLongMO7
- Joe Heck (Nevada 3) @RepJoeHeck | @Heck4Nevada
- Frank Guinta (New Hampshire 1) @frankguinta
- Charles Bass (New Hampshire 2) @RepCharlesBass | @CharlieBassNJ
- Jon Runyan (New Jersey 3) @Runyan2010
- Steve Pearce (New Mexico 2) @stevepearce2010
- Michael Grimm (New York 13) @Grimm4Congress
- Nan Hayworth (New York 19) @RepNanHayworth | @NanHayworth
- Chris Gibson (New York 20) @RepChrisGibson | @ChrisGibson2010
- Richard Hanna (New York 24) @RepRichardHanna | @Hanna4Congress
- Ann Marie Buerkle (New York 25) @RepBuerkle | @votebuerkle
- Renee Ellmers (North Carolina 2) @RepReneeEllmers
- Rick Berg (North Dakota, At Large) @RepRickBerg
- Steve Chabot (Ohio 1) @RepSteveChabot | @SteveChabot
- Bill Johnson (Ohio 6) @RepBillJohnson
- Steve Stivers (Ohio 12) @RepSteveStivers | @Steve_Stivers
- Jim Renacci (Ohio 16) @JRenacci
- Bob Gibbs (Ohio 18 ) @RepBobGibbs | @Bob_Gibbs
- James Lankford (Oklahoma 5) @RepLankford | @jameslankford
- Mike Kelly (Pennsylvania 3) @MikeKellyforPA3
- Pat Meehan (Pennsylvania 7) @PatMeehanPA
- Mike Fitzpatrick (Pennsylvania 8 ) @RepFitzpatrick | @Fitzpatrick2010
- Tom Marino (Pennsylvania 10) @Marino4Congress
- Lou Barletta (Pennsylvania 11) @RepLouBarletta | @loubarletta
- Tim Scott (South Carolina 1) @votetimscott
- Jeff Duncan (South Carolina 3) @Duncan4Congress
- Trey Gowdy (South Carolina 4) @tgowdysc | @tgowdy
- Mick Mulvaney (South Carolina 5) @RepMickMulvaney | @MickMulvaney
- Kristi Noem (South Dakota AL) @KristiNoem
- Chuck Fleischmann (Tennessee 3) @RepChuck | @chuck4congress
- Scott DesJarlais (Tennessee 4) @DesJarlaisTN04 | @tndesjarlais
- Diane Black (Tennessee 6) @DianeBlackTN06
- Stephen Fincher (Tennessee 8 ) @StephenFincher
- Bill Flores (Texas 17) @RepFlores | @Flores4Congress
- Quico Canseco (Texas 23) @RepCanseco | @Quico_Canseco
- Blake Farenthold (Texas 27) @farenthold
- Scott Rigell (Virginia 2) @RepScottRigell | @ScottRigell
- Robert Hurt (Virginia 5) @RepRobertHurt | @RobertHurt
- Morgan Griffith (Virginia 9) @RepMGriffith
- Jaime Herrera (Washington 3) @HerreraBeutler | @JaimeLHerrera
- David McKinley (West Virginia 1) @RepMcKinley | @mckinley4conf
- Sean Duffy (Wisconsin 7) @RepSeanDuffy | @Duffy4Congress
- Reid Ribble (Wisconsin 8 ) @RepRibble | @reidribble
Updated as of February 2, 2011. Please email any additions to rdodsworth@craftdc.com.
Twitter: Nuts and Bolts
Just as Twitter was a useful tool when asking for votes, it can be useful for serving constituents and informing the public. I’ll give you some tips I learned from my years working in the U.S. Senate.
In this post I’ll talk about Twitter nuts and bolts. In my next post, I’ll go into what your boss and your office should tweet about.
Start by creating a new, official account
Yes, I know you have thousands of followers on the campaign account. Yes, I know dual accounts can divide your audience, but until House and Senate rules are clarified it’s a good practice to have separate accounts. Just do it. Now, I have seen offices mix official with campaign tweets, and surprisingly haven’t read any stories about whether this is a violation of Congressional rules. To be safe, keep separate accounts and don’t be the first office to be the subject of such a story.
Sign up for an account
And find a good Twitter name ASAP. Even if you don’t know how you’ll use the account you will at least prevent crafty opponents from snapping up your boss’ name.
Get your staff on Twitter
Activists, reporters, and your constituents are talking on Twitter. Join the party. To get good at Twitter you have to use Twitter. Having a few staffers on Twitter also helps when you want to get added exposure for one of your boss’ tweets.
For staffers already on Twitter, advise them to keep a clear distinction between official business tweets, political tweets, and personal tweets. Staffers can maintain their own personality, but they shouldn’t tweet about fundraisers, campaign events, or helping other campaigns on official office time or using office computers or BlackBerrys. Also, staff should assume any tweet could end up on the front page of The Huffington Post. A disclaimer saying “all opinions are my own” won’t stop a reporter from writing a story. No one wants to lose their job because of an unwise tweet.
Don’t have a staffer pretend to tweet as your boss
Ideally your boss should tweet, but there will be those who simply won’t do it. Don’t create the illusion; there’s enough cynicism in politics. You can still be interesting and get followers without the boss tweeting.
If you plan to have a mix of boss and staff tweets, prevent confusion by labeling the tweets as being from staff. For example, Sen. Russ Feingold’s campaign staff used “STAFF” as a label.
Use analytics
Use a URL shortening service like bit.ly to tracks click-throughs. That way you can see what content is most interesting to your boss’ followers. This gives you an instant focus group.
Cross-market
Push videos on Twitter. Mention Twitter in videos, on Facebook, and in emails to constituents. Have staffers put their boss’ Twitter handle in their email signature. Your audience is across multiple channels, so you need a multi-channel approach to reach them.
Blog Outreach: Beyond the Basics

Over the last few years we’ve seen the merging of professional journalism and weblogging. Still, the vast majority of webloggers you will deal with write online as a hobby. Here’s some additional tips to add to Daniel Huey’s previous post.
Ask before adding to your list
My first piece of advice is to ask if a weblogger wants to be on your e-mail list. Don’t start sending e-mails to them without building a relationship. Filling inboxes with spam will not get you in good graces.
Webloggers are picky
Unlike reporters, webloggers live in a world where they’re working, taking care of their kids, etc. They aren’t like professional webloggers who have a huge appetite for content all day (and night) so they can be more discerning about what they write about.
When building your relationship with webloggers figure out what each person is passionate about. They may care about tax policy or education or they may be interested in the raw politics of Congress. It will take a lot of trial and error and to determine what each weblogger cares about.
Occasionally you will find some webloggers who will post anything you send them. They may be trying to transform their weblog into a money-making site by building their traffic. Take advantage of their need for content.
Get your boss to talk to them
Webloggers are a combination of activists and writers. They care deeply about issues and have an agenda. At the same time they use the Internet to educate, persuade, and rally others around causes. Having your boss talk to them will build trust and be a source of ideas and feedback. Here are a few things you can do:
- Hold off-the-record conference calls with a select group of webloggers to give them a candid take of how your boss and Congress is performing, how he or she can improve, and what the grassroots cares about. The goal of the call shouldn’t be about pushing a message. It should be about your boss listening.
- Talk one-on-one with a weblogger. This could either be on the phone or over a cup of coffee. Your boss will have lists of calls to make everyday. Add a weblogger to the list to build deeper relations with the blogosphere.
- Give exclusive guest posts to webloggers. Unique content will attract eyeballs for the weblog. The weblogger will appreciate that. Also, follow up by responding to comments. Readers will respect your boss more if they know he or she is being a part of an actual conversation.
Analog Adventure in Tokyo
Election season.
Day after day, hour after hour, crisis after crisis you’ve long since lost any sense of normalcy as your reality has been engulfed by your own volition into an endless cycle of work and stress.
Finally the wave of work crashes over you – a long building torrent of tension suddenly crescendos leaving worry, stress and sleeplessness to evaporate.
So for me there was no more logical choice to go on vacation far, far away.
I had a plan.
No beaches, cruises or tropical settings.
Instead I’d travel to Tokyo, Japan.
Really it was one large excuse to eat copious amounts of sushi and take voluminous amounts of photos.
But, somewhere along the way I discovered a love for film. My newfound affair started with a Rolleiflex T Type 1 medium format camera (circa 1958) and quickly expanded with names like, Velvia, Portra and Ilford (different types of 120 film).
The Rolleiflex is a somewhat brutal looking piece of German engineering. It’s a TLR meaning there are two lenses, one that allows you to view the image, the other for actually taking the photo. Their visage is such that they look the part of a STAR WARS contraption rather than a completely mechanical photographic masterpiece.
Yet the brutal machine is a romantic device – and film is a seductress. Everything is manual. You load the film, set it in place – push the shutter (nearly silent) and then turn the crank to advance the film. It feels genuine. There’s no digital metering, no autofocus, no instant gratification of seeing the moment in time you just captured on a LCD screen. Instead you have to be careful. You have 12 shots on a roll of 120 film – as opposed to more than a 1,000 shots using a 64 gig card in a DSLR.
The greatest sensation you receive when using the Rolleiflex is in composing your shot. You look down unto ground glass, where the image is reversed much like a mirror. Every reaction to the scene you make during composition must be opposite to what you see on the screen. It’s a hauntingly disconnected feeling, yet at the click of the shutter you feel like you accomplished a great heist, stealing a moment in time. It feels good.
So good in fact, that after several days of taking both the Rolleiflex and my Canon 5D Mark II on adventures around Tokyo, I gamely decided to let the Canon rest at the hotel.
It was a good decision. At the end of the day I shot 20 rolls of film – the results of which tell a far better story of Tokyo than the hundreds of digital clicks from the first two days of my trip.
Film is not without it’s traps and challenges. Operating a 52-year-old camera without a manual can be a bit of a challenge. I didn’t load the film properly on a number of rolls leading to scratches on the negative. But even with scratches the film still had beauty. Finding the correct exposure was the biggest challenge. I had to use a light meter and then many times just guess on my shutter speed and F-stop for a given situation.
Film is also complicated on the backside. You have to get the film processed with each type of film requiring a different development process (B+W Negative, Color Negative, Color Transparency). If you are truly enterprising you can develop the film yourself. Even after developing, you need to scan your film and then process it further in Lightroom just as I do my digital files. It’s a labor of love.
While I’ve dipped my toes into the realm of film photography, I’m still a staunch digital supporter in the field of motion picture. 35mm motion picture film is a truly majestic aesthetic, yet one unattainable for most budgets.
Over the last two years there has been an arms race among camera manufactures to produce digital cinema cameras that allow cinematographers to produce near film quality looks at dramatic cost savings. On the high end, the RED camera is an equal to 35mm film in resolution. The canon 5D Mark II has an aesthetic quality rivaling film because it is capable of greater shallow depth of film. This winter, both Panasonic and Sony will introduce new camera bodies that use cinema glass. Innovation is coming fast and furious.
Film versus digital is a grand rolling debate, in both the photo and motion picture world. But there are no right answers. They are just tools, different cameras, formats, processes and they all have their place. I’m just happy to have rediscovered the joy of composing using film while on a wonderful adventure in Japan.
Please enjoy a selection of photos I took using my Rolleiflex:
(The complete set can be found here.)

Velvia film yields amazing saturation of colors. The colorful face was part of larger advertisement in a long underground corridor running through Western Shinjuku.

Tokyo is a mammoth city crawling with people. I was particularly struck by how many salarymen just tend to wander around aimlessly engulfed yet isolated in a city of millions.

Shibuya station is a busy crossroads and social hub.

I was fortunate enough to capture this moment from a traditional Japanese wedding being held at the Meji Shrine.

This is Hideo Asano. He’s a former journalist who covered the civil war in Afghanistan, a novelist and a Haiku poet. He’s also homeless. We met in Ueno Park, this is his portrait.

A perfect moment. A large wringed crowd had gathered in Ueno park to see this street performer. I snuck towards the front to snap a pic and he spied me and struck a pose just as I did.

Cyclist in Shibuya. It feels as if the whole city is on his tail ready to swallow him whole.

I read somewhere that 1 in 10 Japanese own a Louis Vuitton product. Tokyo residents’ materialism is ever-present.

Spying an acrobat through the crowd.

Julie Germany – the film scratches and backlighting are haunting but beautiful.

Self-portrait.
It’s Personal
During the battle over healthcare legislation, the Left frequently invoked touching personal stories and anecdotes to illustrate their points and bolster their positions. This is an effective tactic often overlooked by the Right.
Aside from the obvious benefits to messaging, utilizing these personal examples provides compelling motivation for action. This tactic can help move you from sound bites to rallies, from articles to donations, and awareness to votes.
Invoking Emotions
By personifying a policy, you can provide an emotional hook and human connection that will motivate people to be more deeply connected to your issue.
Providing Symbolism
Every cause needs a symbol. They provide a rallying point and unified theme that everyone can relate to. Everyone likes to feel like they are part of something larger than themselves. Symbols make that experience more tangible.
Articulating Policy
This is a useful tactic to explain particularly intricate policies. First hand accounts can show the importance and real-world impact of otherwise esoteric ideas.
Holding Attention
In the never-ending fight for people’s time and attention, memorable personal stories keep particular issues and topics top of mind. When these stories are illustrated in emails and videos (and distributed properly) they have the potential to go viral.
Driving Action
Organizers on the Left often rely on personal stories, and then immediately invoke them as part of a call to action. Again, this creates an emotional stir, and then immediately provides an outlet to express that compassion, anger, or excitement.
Not Political
When exposed to an overtly political message, most people literally or figuratively switch off. These stories capture and hold an audience’s attention because they are inherently about people, not politics.
As we set out under new leadership in the House and look ahead to the 2012 election, the Right must continue to assess the effectiveness of our message and how it connects with the everyday concerns of Americans. In order to continue the current momentum the Right must draw clear distinctions between their policies and those of the Left. More importantly, these stories help to keep focus on the real world, grassroots level where success or failure is ultimately judged.






